Dr gunnar beck is an eu lawyer and legal and political philosopher. Buy the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu, by gunnar beck, isbn 9781849463232, published by hart publishing from. For beck the crisis has brought to the fore an unprecedented breakdown in the rule of law and representative democracy in postww ii europe, which is epitomized by the only thinly disguised political role played by central banks and the eu and national courts. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu modern studies in european law. Legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu by michal bobek. Dr gunnar beck is an eu lawyer and legal philosopher. Lev, this i is an attempt to describe generally the process of legal reasoning in the field of case law and in the interpretation of statutes and of the constitution. Vaughne miller, house of commons library, briefing paper number 07230, 16. It raises, as will be seen, broader issues as to the nature of legal reasoning and the role played therein by text and background purpose or teleology. It is here that the court gives reason for its legal ruling, and it helps other courts, lawyers and judges to use and. The court of justice of the eu and the vienna convention on the.
Beck acknowledges that courts regularly deploy an admixture of textual and purposive argumentation when reaching their conclusions, but nonetheless. Gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice of. Text and telos in the european court of justice gunnar. He is also the convenor for the ma in law presessional course in legal methodology and reasoning. Text and telos in the european court of justice gunnar beck, the. First, by the way of introduction, the main threads of the past debates on the judicial method in the court are recalled. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu overdrive. In theory, judicial interpretation is a process which. Text and telos in the european court of justice gunnar beck. The legal reasoning of the court of justice and the euro crisis the flexibility of the courts cumulative approach and the pringle case g beck maastricht journal of european and comparative law 20 4, 635648, 20.
Gunnar beck is a reader in eu law and legal theory at soas, university of london, and a barrister at henderson chambers. Essays in honour of lord mackenzie stuart trenton 1996. Legal reasoning in the case of a courts ruling is found in the discussion or analysis section of the judicial ruling. What is legal reasoning and how to apply it correctly. Legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu by. The scope of application of analogical reasoning in statutory law1 dr.
The scope of application of analogical reasoning in statutory. Panel discussion of judicial power and brexit judicial power. To what extent is this a fair description of the courts jurisprudence over more than half a century. Legal reasoning under the common law has at least two meanings. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. Available on bloomsbury collections where your library has access.
Bertea, law and legal reasoning, northern ireland legal quarterly 59, 2008, 419. Pdf the european court of justice as a constitutional. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu modern studies in european law beck, gunnar on. He teaches courses in eu law and our undergraduate course in legal methodology and systems illp. The judgment is determinative of the dispute and constrains litigants and lawmakers. The courts approach to legal reasoning may therefore be described either as a cumulative 16or variable approach. A p bhardwaj top results of your surfing a p bhardwaj start download portable document format pdf and ebooks electronic books free online rating news 20162017 is books that can provide inspiration, insight, knowledge to the reader. Numerous scholars have commented on the judicial style of the court of justice of the european union and its nonherculean judges, generally disapproving of its minimalist reasoning, lack of transparency, and failure to draw openly on comparative legal sources to avoid inconsistencies and weaknesses in its legal reasoning. Gunnar beck is a german academic, eu lawyer and member of the european parliament. The need for judicial interpretation arises from the fact of legal cer. On the one hand, legal concepts are argued to be real entities which posses an inherent meaning. Pdf text and telos in the legal reasoning of the ecj.
On this view, legal concepts are distinguished from. Pdf the european court of justice as a constitutional court. The legal reasoning of the court of justice and the euro crisis the flexibility of the courts cumulative approach and the pringle case g beck maastricht journal. Lse europe in question discussion paper series the. Legal reasoning, beck concludes, is ordinary legal reasoning in extraordinary language, and judicial decisionmaking is subject not to rules, but to regularities political as well as psychological, rhetorical no less than methodological regularities. Gunnar beck s the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. Aug 05, 2016 legal reasoning is a method of thought and argument used by lawyers and judges when applying legal rules to specific interactions among legal persons. Ebook a p bhardwaj as pdf download portable document format. Why do the european court of justice judges need legal concepts. The court of justice of the eu and the vienna convention on the law of treaties gunnar beck i. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu by.
Answering such questions is the business of a theory of legal reasoning. Gunnar beck is a reader in eu law and legal theory at soas, university of london, and a barrister at 1 essex court chambers of sir tony baldry mp. Read the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu by dr gunnar beck available from rakuten kobo. Maciej koszowski2 assistant professor at jan dlugosz university czestochowa, poland abstract this article addresses the scope of the potential applications of an analogical argument in the domain of statutory law. In the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu 20 beck argues that the problem. The need for judicial interpretation arises from the fact of legal certainty in legal texts. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. Constitutional court fcc, 2 even gunnar beck must now concede that the ecj is a court that has lost its legal way. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eumodern. Dr gunnar beck is reader in eu law and legal theory at the university of london and the author of the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu, hart publishing, oxford 20. Courts, the common law approach and the application of. Part one develops a new heuristic theory of legal reasoning which argues that legal. By martin howe qc, francis hoar and gunnar beck introduction both the uk government and the eu27 have expressed the desire to reach an early settlement on the rights of eu citizens resident in the uk and uk citizens resident in the eu27. Gunnar beck reader lecturer in eu law and legal theory.
National legal traditions at work in the jurisprudence of the. Joxerramonbengoetxea, the legal reasoning of the european court of justice towards a european jurisprudence clarendon press, 1993. Legal reasoning in a comparative perspective find, read and cite all the. Gunnar beck, stating that he does not quite understand the meaning of paul craigs formulations, immediately reveals the emptiness in an essence of a form of legal reasoning that does not take the law seriously beck 20. Beck, gunnar judicial activism in the court of justice of the eu. Gunnar beck media of the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. Gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu hart publishing, 2012.
Recent takes on the legal reasoning of the ecj 2 q1 joxerramon bengoetxea 3 gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu hart. Jan 21, 20 about the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. Gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice. Legal reasoning is to be understood as a form of practical reasoning concerning these very issues. An introduction to legal reasoning university of chicago. Legal reasoning legal reasoning is the particular method of arguing used when applying legal rules to particular interactions among legal persons. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu wildy. More about gunnar beck the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. At present gunnar is engaged in a study entitled the european court of justice and legal. Suvi sankari, european court of justice legal reasoning in context europa law publishing, 20. Legal reasoning in a comparative perspective find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. Gunnar beck is a lecturer in law at the school of oriental and african.
Legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu by michal. Legal reasoning, text, purpose and teleology article pdf available in maastricht journal of european and comparative law 141 may 20 with 209 reads how we measure reads. Text and telos in the european court of justice gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu hart publishing2012 486 p. He teaches our ug course introduction to eu law, the pg course eu law in global context and for many years convened the ma in law presessional course in legal methodology and reasoning.
The legal reasoning of the court of justice and the euro. Legal reasoning and interpretation routledge encyclopedia. The court of justice, legal reasoning, and the pringle case law as the continuation of politics by other means by gunnar beck topics. Gunnar beck has written widely on the legal and economic aspects of the euro crisis. A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match1 jaap hage university of limburg, department of metajuridica, email.
Gunnar beck is very critical of the cjeu, castigating it for reasoning that is said to be absurd, and accusing it of crossing the line between legal reasoning and political judgment. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu researchgate. Gunnar becks the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu. Bhardwaj is the author of legal aptitude for the clat workbook 3. Pringle and the nature of legal reasoning digital repository. Pdf on jan 1, 2014, giulio itzcovich and others published the european court of justice as a constitutional court. He teaches our ug course introduction to eu law, the pg course eu law in global context and for many years convened the ma in law presessional course in legal methodology and reasoning for many years. Taking a broader approach, beck notes that all constitutionlike jurisdictions. Their interdependence leads to eu judicial politics being played out as a series of sequential interactions in three arenas. Bhardwaj author of legal aptitude for the clat workbook.
The court of justice of the eu and the vienna convention on. Jan 21, 20 buy the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu modern studies in european law 01 by gunnar beck isbn. See gunnar beck, the legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu 52 2012. Pdf how judges think download full pdf book download. On this understanding of legal concepts it is possible to explain why they are able to prescribe conduct and bind legal officials as to what has to be done with disputes they are required to solve. Introduction legal uncertainty is a universal feature of primary legal materials in all legal systems. The legal reasoning of the court of justice of the eu modern. Uk government position the british governments position is that. May 28, 2014 perhaps as a sign of the times, both issues, judicial reasoning and the legitimacy of the court of justice, are coming to the fore again. The european court of justice as a constitutional court. The court of justice of the european union has often been characterised both as a motor of integration and a judicial lawmaker. While particularly relevant to the tasks of lawyers and judges, the requirements of legal reasoning also affect the legislator because addition of new rules or modification of existing ones needs to be. Reasoning from either rules or principles must always involve some process of interpretation, so how does interpretive reasoning enter into the practical reason of law.
303 31 1448 669 1588 1102 705 1505 530 13 242 1111 688 308 212 416 929 468 422 1585 916 356 1282 151 317 347 299 221 285 472 1369 828 1507 791 1436 1114 400 343 1202 273